The portal for colour binding proofs, colour proofs, digital proofs, online proofs. Compact knowledge on colour management, graphics, measuring technology & more.
New PANTONE Formula Guides with incorrect ink formulations
Several errors have crept into the new PANTONE 2023 fan decks. In both the PANTONE Solid Coated and the Solid Uncoated color fans, there are colours for which the new ink formulations are incorrect.
In the PANTONE Formula Guide Solid Coated fan 2023, PANTONE 107 C and PANTONE 108 C have absolutely identical ink recipes, as well as PANTONE 113 C and PANTONE 114 C. As the colors differ, this cannot be the correct.
Several errors in the PANTONE Solid Uncoated fan 2023
In the PANTONE Solid Uncoated fan 2023 it gets even more critical: In the new fan, PANTONE 106 U and PANTONE 107 U have exactly the same ink formulation, the same applies to the formulations of PANTONE 108 U and PANTONE 109 U as well as for PANTONE 113 U and PANTONE 114 U which also have identical colour formulations.
PANTONE Connect also with formulation errors
But not only in print are the formulations wrong, in PANTONE Connect the shown formulations are identically wrong. In one case, in PANTONE Connect, the PANTONE 109 U spot colour even has a different, but nevertheless incorrect formulation, as it shows the exact ink percentages of the PANTONE 110 U.
At the same time, there are 3 formulations for 1 colour:
Currently there are three formulations for PANTONE 109 U within PANTONE, as the former fandecks are still available for sale on the PANTONE website: Of the three formulations, one is old and the two new ones are wrong.
PANTONE 109 U
The “old” formulation of the still available previous fans: PANTONE Yellow: 98.5% PANTONE Warm Red 1.50%
The new formulation of the 2023 fan, probably wrong: PANTONE Yellow PY 12: 27.01% PANTONE Orange 016: 1.07% PANTONE HD Extender: 71.92%
The new formulation from PANTONE Connect, probably wrong: PANTONE Yellow PY 12: 51.95% PANTONE Orange 016: 3.28% PANTONE HD Extender: 44,77%
An annoying mishap that PANTONE has made here. I am curious if and when PANTONE will correct the mistakes. In PANTONE Connect it can be done with a simple update, but current colour fans will hardly be able to be exchanged or supplemented with corrected pages.
Today I received an email in which PANTONE asked how it should orientate its products and services in the future. The users were asked which countries, industries and company sizes they come from, but also what PANTONE products should look like in the future and what customers would be prepared to pay for PANTONE services in the future. Question: How much can PANTONE services cost? PANTONE appears to be orientating itself on the PANTONE Connect prices: All price queries have the lowest price category < $ 7,- / month, i.e. … read more
In recent weeks, there have been lengthy discussions on the Fogra digital printing mailing list as to whether a research project should be launched to define standardised tonal value gradations for spot colours. What is this all about? In the field of CMYK and seven-colour printing, the definition of clear, printable and proofable standards is well established and has been tried and tested in practice. If the paper or paper class is known and defined, a measuring standard such as M0/M1/M2 has been established and the content of optical brighteners … read more
After Eddy Hagen pointed out in this posts, that there were some major colour deviations between the brand new PANTONE Solid Coated Guide 2023 and the previous version especially for the PANTONE 2635 C, I was curious to lookup the same colours in the new PANTONE Color Bridge Coated Guide of 2023 and compare the colours with the previous version. I measured a dE00 of 8,15 between the two colours that Eddy mentioned, which is really far apart from how accurate PANTONE colours should match between the different PANTONE guides. … read more
Whether it’s a large global corporation or a small company, the following often applies to designs or redesigns today: we develop everything for digital first.
The announcement was hot: As of March 2022, Adobe software products will no longer contain PANTONE colour libraries. What follows now? Who loses, who wins?
The ISO 12647-7 proofing standard was revised in November 2016 and the test criteria for FograCert contract proof creation were adapted. We have now incorporated these changed criteria into our proofing system and are now working to the stricter tolerances of the latest ISO 12647-7:2016. Why hardly anything changes for our Proof customers The good news is: you won’t notice that our proofs are now precisely produced according to the latest standards. Why? Quite simply: Because our demands on our proofing system, our FIERY proofing software, our EFI proofing papers and … read more
Pantone colours can be simulated very well today. T be able in advance to see how well your Pantone colour can be reproduced, we have published tables of all Pantone inks where the colour differences of the Pantone colours can be looked up already before proofing. Colour variations of Pantone colours in Delta-E Colour variations of Pantone metallic colours in Delta-E We have now even photographed some pictures that visually show how appropriate proofs on the latest Pantone subjects.
2 thoughts on “New PANTONE Formula Guides with incorrect ink formulations”
Hello Matthias.
Nice explanation and well documented example!
One more brick which explains what this company became, so far.
You certainly already heard about new approaches avoiding the use of Pantone as the only Spot Color system reference. The BBCG project from Eddy Haggen/Dr. Kai Lankinen proves there are some other ways to deal with.
It is not wrong! Pantone has updated the Formula guide because of new solid inks and some metamerian effect after coating! The new 14 colour based inks comes without Barium. They also changed the transparent white to HD extender to reducing some yellowing effects. And the whole new thing was formulated to it’s paper colour too. That is why there is a difference between formulated colour and Pantone Connect.
So, when You define a spot Color just use it’s number as before, but when You formulating it, the best way is to use a formulation software and techniques and set the Pantone digital spot as reference!
The printed Pantone Formule Guide book has an aim to show the spot colours with less colour deviation than 2 (dE 2000).
Hello Matthias.
Nice explanation and well documented example!
One more brick which explains what this company became, so far.
You certainly already heard about new approaches avoiding the use of Pantone as the only Spot Color system reference. The BBCG project from Eddy Haggen/Dr. Kai Lankinen proves there are some other ways to deal with.
Sincerely.
Hi!
It is not wrong! Pantone has updated the Formula guide because of new solid inks and some metamerian effect after coating! The new 14 colour based inks comes without Barium. They also changed the transparent white to HD extender to reducing some yellowing effects. And the whole new thing was formulated to it’s paper colour too. That is why there is a difference between formulated colour and Pantone Connect.
So, when You define a spot Color just use it’s number as before, but when You formulating it, the best way is to use a formulation software and techniques and set the Pantone digital spot as reference!
The printed Pantone Formule Guide book has an aim to show the spot colours with less colour deviation than 2 (dE 2000).